Personally, It depends at what stage in research I'm in
For casual use, not looking for news, those days where you're relaxing yet the qualms of the world seem to leak in no matter what... Social Media is usually the source
Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Tiktok, YouTube, etc.
If it's not social media, it's probably my overly political friend and I mean OVERLY political. He'll debate people online about race, abortion, trump, with people who disagree for FUN
Anyway, after hearing about whatever subject information that's been flung into my face by an algorithm or my friend and I myself am interested enough to verify the information myself. There are a couple things I do. All starting with Google.
I simply add some key terms into what I've heard about the subject into Google and depending on my search results I'll believe the information.
1. If multiple reputable news sites have reported the same issue and all have the same information then
it's most likely true
But what are reputable sites
Forbes.com, known for its listings of certain topics, made a list of
Top 10 Journalism Brands Where You Find Real Facts Rather Than Alternative Facts
Which Included: New York Times
The Washington Post
BBC
The Economist
The New Yorker
Wire Services like The Associates Press, Reuters, and Bloomberg News Foreign Affairs
The Atlantic
In that order with some honorable mentions being
National Public Radio, TIME Magazine, The Christian Science Monitor, The Los Angeles Times, USA Today, CNN, NBC News, CBS News, ABC News, etc.
They have reasonings under each source to explain why they got their ranking or why they're good/bad
So look out for those names when trying to verify a story, BUT if you don't trust that method, another way you could go about it is to Wikipedia search the news source itself
Yes, there's a big stigmatism, "Don't use Wikipedia," and while I'm not saying use Wikipedia for your next big research paper, I am saying Wikipedia can give you a quick and simple answer to the validity of a news source.
If Wiki says, "This is a notorious satire site" DON'T trust it
If Wiki says, "This is a beloved new source founded in 1940" It's pretty trust worthy
2. If I'm super super invested and my search results didn't satisfy me, I tend to go to fact checking
websites like
Snopes.com, Polifact.com, Factcheck.org, The Washington Post's own fact checker, etc.
Their sole purpose is the look around for stories on the internet, fact check them, and then present to you whether the stories are true or false
I'm partial to Snopes.com myself, they indicate the validity of a story with a big green check or a big red X and explain why the story's true or explain why the news got it wrong
The last thing I verified on there was a picture of a polar bear boarding a train or bus in Russia. Snopes immediately hit be with that big red X explaining that the bear wasn't actually a bear but a puppet for a cause to "save the polar bears"
Pretty cool, Very Easy to navigate.
There's my two cents:
Don't blindly trust social media
Don't trust the first results Google gives you
See if other trustworthy sources have covered the topic
Fact check the story
No comments:
Post a Comment